Skip to main content
Jonathan.'s user avatar
Jonathan.'s user avatar
Jonathan.'s user avatar
Jonathan.
  • Member for 14 years, 6 months
  • Last seen more than 5 years ago
revised
Stackoverflow.com Enhancer (sticky top bars)
added 191 characters in body; edited title
Loading…
asked
Loading…
comment
Clarification on StackApps "App" vs "Script"
@drachenstern, of course your right, sorry Jeff
comment
api 2.0 - any plans to bring SE sites closer together?
+1 (+100 if I could). Sadly StackAuth 1.1 has gone in the opposite direction; increasing the amount of requests you need to do.
comment
Clarification on StackApps "App" vs "Script"
Some apps run a in a webbrowser, eg stackapps.com/questions/36. So i think your first point on app is not true.
comment
Stack Overflow Tag Manager
I can now finally hide the [app] questions here! :) (be even better though if they were visible on the apps tab, but I never go there so...) Could you add the ability to highlight different tags with different colours, eg highlight [iphone] [ipad] [objective-c] in orange, but highlight just [git] in green? Awesome script!!!
comment
Add Twitter accounts on the /sites route?
@Kevin then I dont suppose a parameter on the 1.1/sites to stop pagniation would be possible?
comment
Add Twitter accounts on the /sites route?
there is a stackapps twitter account just nothing has been tweeted yet.
accepted
comment
Add Twitter accounts on the /sites route?
@Kevin, very sorry I missed them on there, is there any chance of them being added to 1.0. I'm now having to decide between the pagination and the twitter links.
comment
Add Twitter accounts on the /sites route?
@Kevin Any update on this with 1.1 out and no sign of it? It would be great if it could be added to both 1.1 and 1.0. Seeing as 1.0 stackauth is more useful.
comment
StackKit: an API framework for Cocoa
@Dave of course I just got confused between NSFetchRequest and NSURLRequest. By coincidence I just forked it today, while learning about git. Thanks I realised I have been using an out of date StackKit for a while, so while the basics are the same I'll have to get used to the Builders instead of Endpoints.
revised
iStack for iPad
deleted 697 characters in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
Add reputation and site URL to 1.1 associated accounts
@Kevin, Sorry i don't understand your last sentence. For now I'll keep using 1.0 and bring this up again when we get to 2.0. But please tell me why the association id is returned in the response?
comment
Add reputation and site URL to 1.1 associated accounts
@Kevin, I know I've read it, just saying when both 1.x are superseded, will the 1.0 still be around?
comment
Add reputation and site URL to 1.1 associated accounts
@Kevin the stackauth 1.1 methods are a step backward from 1.0. Hopefully 1.0 on stackauth will never be gotten rid of. On the other hand te rest of 1.1 is fantastic.
comment
Add reputation and site URL to 1.1 associated accounts
@George this is what I thought, so it means making 14 requests if the user has 13 accounts (for example). This doesn't sound pike saving bandwidth. And currently the identification of sites is very flimsy. Its like if the API only let you get questions from their title and there was no IDs for questions.
accepted
1
15 16
17
18 19
29