35

This question serves as an organized reference of client libraries available for the Stack Exchange API. This is intended to be an all-inclusive list of libraries, so if you develop a library, feel free to insert it into the list below in the appropriate location. Each library is listed in alphabetical order under the language it is written / developed for.

Language       Name            API Version   Newest Release  
===========================================================  
ActionScript   ActionStack             1.0    July  9, 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
C++            so++                    1.0    July 13, 2010 
-----------------------------------------------------------
D              Tangoverflow            1.0    June  1, 2010 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Java           StackExchange           1.0    July  8, 2010  
               stackoverflow-java-sdk  1.1    Feb. 18, 2011  
               StackWrap4J             1.0    July 26, 2010  
-----------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript     Soapi.JS                1.0    July 19, 2010  
               Soapi.JS 2              1.0    Sept 17, 2010  
               Stack.JS                2.0    Jan. 23, 2012  
               StackScript             1.0    July  9, 2010  
               StackUnderflow.js       1.0    Dec. 22, 2011  
-----------------------------------------------------------
.Net           BridgeStack             2.0    Jan. 22, 2012  
               Stacky                  2.0    Jan. 19, 2012  
               Soapi.CS                1.0    Sept 16, 2010  
-----------------------------------------------------------
Objective-C    CoreStack               1.0    Nov.  7, 2011  
               StackKit                1.0    Feb.  8, 2011  
               MSOEngine               1.0    June  4, 2010  
-----------------------------------------------------------
Perl           Net::StackExchange2     2.1    Feb.  3, 2013
----------------------------------------------------------
PHP            PHPstack                1.0    June 26, 2010  
               Stack.PHP               2.0    Feb.  5, 2012  
-----------------------------------------------------------
Python         Stack.PY                2.1    May  14, 2012  
               Py-StackExchange        1.1    Dec. 18, 2011  
               pyso.py                 1.0    Oct. 24, 2010  
               se-api-py               2.1    Feb. 26, 2013
               stack2py                2.1    Mar. 16, 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ruby           Pilha                   1.1    Dec.  4, 2011  
               rubyoverflow            2.0    Jan.  3, 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------
Improve this question
17
  • I've done a PHP wrapper but don't have enough reputation to edit it in. Could someone link to it? Commented May 28, 2010 at 14:28
  • There you go. :) Commented May 28, 2010 at 15:16
  • Why's D in there? And thanks for adding MSOEngine to the list whoever did it Commented May 28, 2010 at 19:21
  • @Matt: D needs a wrapper too. Every compiled language deserves a wrapper IMHO. Commented May 29, 2010 at 1:03
  • @George If somebody creates one for D I will learn D just to use it Commented May 29, 2010 at 1:07
  • @Thomas: I started a branch on Launchpad. Only one file in, but I'll get back to it later today. Commented May 29, 2010 at 14:01
  • @dal: I added it. Commented May 29, 2010 at 21:23
  • 1
    @Thomas It's ON!!! Commented May 30, 2010 at 1:57
  • What about plain C? I like C more than C++ oddly enough. Also where is the Assembly and Machine Code love? Commented May 31, 2010 at 6:28
  • @Earlz: I'll add it... but don't expect a lot of love... :) Commented May 31, 2010 at 6:30
  • yes, because somebody will write a library in assembly. What I want is one for the TRS-80 :) Commented May 31, 2010 at 14:50
  • Well, if someone wrote a C library (I imagine the C++ one would be a pain to work with) you could call it from assembly. :) (Realistically, some call-out would be required anyway, so it's not cheating that much.) Commented May 31, 2010 at 17:02
  • 1
    Considering the only user of the assembly version would be Steve Gibson, I think it's OK to skip it... Commented Jun 28, 2010 at 4:51
  • Thanks whoever reformatted the page. I was going to do it myself anyway... now I don't have to. Commented Aug 22, 2010 at 18:40
  • @code: It's not the first time... look closely at the edit history. Commented Aug 23, 2010 at 20:56

0

Reset to default

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.