Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

If a post has no owner for whatever reason, we don't get the owner object in the response.

Thus, it is impossible to display the username of the missing owner. The site is able to do this, so we should be given the name of the user as well.

See meta question #33809meta question #33809 for a view of all of these scenarios.

Here is an example request returning now owner at all:

http://api.meta.stackoverflow.com/1.0/answers/33812

I feel that this is very important, othwerwise we are unable to attribute a post to an author.

If a post has no owner for whatever reason, we don't get the owner object in the response.

Thus, it is impossible to display the username of the missing owner. The site is able to do this, so we should be given the name of the user as well.

See meta question #33809 for a view of all of these scenarios.

Here is an example request returning now owner at all:

http://api.meta.stackoverflow.com/1.0/answers/33812

I feel that this is very important, othwerwise we are unable to attribute a post to an author.

If a post has no owner for whatever reason, we don't get the owner object in the response.

Thus, it is impossible to display the username of the missing owner. The site is able to do this, so we should be given the name of the user as well.

See meta question #33809 for a view of all of these scenarios.

Here is an example request returning now owner at all:

http://api.meta.stackoverflow.com/1.0/answers/33812

I feel that this is very important, othwerwise we are unable to attribute a post to an author.

edited tags
Link
Kevin Montrose
  • 18.7k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 62
i cnt tpye...
Source Link
jjnguy
  • 3k
  • 15
  • 14

If a post has no owner for whatever reason, we don't get the owner object in ththe response.

Thus, it is impossible to display the username of the missing owner. The site is able to do this, so we should be given the name of the user as well.

See meta question #33809 for a view of all of these scenarios.

Here is an example request returning now owner at all:

http://api.meta.stackoverflow.com/1.0/answers/33812

I feel that this is very important, othwerwise we are unable to attribute a post to an author.

If a post has no owner for whatever reason, we don't get the owner object in th response.

Thus, it is impossible to display the username of the missing owner. The site is able to do this, so we should be given the name of the user as well.

See meta question #33809 for a view of all of these scenarios.

Here is an example request returning now owner at all:

http://api.meta.stackoverflow.com/1.0/answers/33812

I feel that this is very important, othwerwise we are unable to attribute a post to an author.

If a post has no owner for whatever reason, we don't get the owner object in the response.

Thus, it is impossible to display the username of the missing owner. The site is able to do this, so we should be given the name of the user as well.

See meta question #33809 for a view of all of these scenarios.

Here is an example request returning now owner at all:

http://api.meta.stackoverflow.com/1.0/answers/33812

I feel that this is very important, othwerwise we are unable to attribute a post to an author.

added another sentence because i'm bored
Source Link
jjnguy
  • 3k
  • 15
  • 14
Loading
added link to a request
Source Link
jjnguy
  • 3k
  • 15
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
jjnguy
  • 3k
  • 15
  • 14
Loading