++ for answer=true. seems a no brainer.

Jeff- stackapps.com/questions/386/… , stackapps.com/questions/409/… and more on the way - this is why it would be very useful.

this is good to know. gives me confidence that my efforts at automating are not likely to be obsoleted. as an aside - your quick efforts at fixing the docs broke my generator. I had to go in and remove special case code and un-fail tests. ;-) good job.

are the results examples generated or composed?