Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with caching
Search options not deleted
user 113
For questions about caching results of API calls and / or how caching affects user scripts when used on the Stack Exchange sites.
3
votes
Why does the API lack (proper) HTTP cache control headers?
Caching is hard
Caching and cache invalidation is hard. Often, if not always, you need to intimately know the data to be able to cache it effectively. … So, from server's point of view, this kind of caching is pointless. …
- 405