It looks like you are sending a malformed access token.
Your example, Vy*iWEzkfPKHAzx7PEtJcA%2529%2529
is not of the proper form and exhibits classic URI encoding corruption.
Valid tokens all seem to be 24 characters that end in ))
. And )
is often encoded as %29
by browsers depending on how you get it and/or cut and paste.
')' === decodeURIComponent ('%29')
Additionally, %25
is the URI encoding of %
, so your token was double URI encoded. (That's two times too many. ;) )
When I send the same request, with a validly formatted token (which I have since deauthorized):
/2.2/me?access_token=Vza4EEmVimmN4l3O9qZ87Q)) ...
I get a valid result.
When I double URI-encode the token:
/2.2/me?site=access_token=Vza4EEmVimmN4l3O9qZ87Q%2529%2529 ...
I get the same 500 error that you got.
Note: The links above show the proper full format. Obviously, they won't work for you since I deauth'd the token (to protect my account's virginity).
You can go to the doc page, fetch your own token, and plug it into the above links and it will work.
PS: At this moment, your base token (Vy*iWEzkfPKHAzx7PEtJcA))
) appears to still be valid. When I fetch the link:
/2.2/me?site=stackoverflow&access_token=Vy*iWEzkfPKHAzx7PEtJcA))
I get a valid but empty result:
{"items":[],"has_more":false,"quota_max":10000,"quota_remaining":9998}
which suggests that there might be some security against token hijacking. :)