Timeline for (Should we) add [Staff] labels to staff member flairs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2022 at 5:39 | history | edited | Glorfindel♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 25, 2022 at 5:39 | vote | accept | Glorfindel♦ | ||
| May 24, 2022 at 23:59 | answer | added | Kyle PollardStaff♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 18, 2022 at 15:49 | history | edited | JNatStaff♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 18, 2022 at 15:48 | answer | added | tanj92Staff | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 4, 2022 at 17:33 | comment | added | V2Blast | Just confirming that the status-review tag on this post did add it to our radar. :) | |
| May 4, 2022 at 17:14 | history | edited | rene♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 27, 2022 at 20:02 | comment | added | 0Valt | @NotTheDr01ds StackApps is a little special (in a good sense of the word) in that regards - kind of like MSE, the mod-only tags are present despite this not being a Meta site. | |
| Apr 27, 2022 at 19:53 | comment | added | Glorfindel♦ | @NotTheDr01ds that would work, but it feels rather strange to put a [status-review] on my own request. Of course I can ask rene :) | |
| Apr 27, 2022 at 19:51 | comment | added | NotTheDr01ds | Agreed that this seems useful. On other Meta sites, I believe the Mods can add the status-review tag to a Meta post for Staff to review a change request. Does that work here, or perhaps not since this isn't considered a Meta site? Not sure. | |
| Apr 21, 2022 at 17:17 | comment | added | 0Valt | Agreed, that sounds quite useful here as staff often act as an authoritative source on API matters. | |
| Apr 20, 2022 at 16:37 | comment | added | rene♦ | I confirm I did visit the user profile as well for the exact same reason. | |
| Apr 20, 2022 at 16:29 | history | asked | Glorfindel♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |