Timeline for StackLINQ: A StackExchange LINQ Provider
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackapps.com/ with https://stackapps.com/
|
|
| Aug 2, 2010 at 14:04 | history | edited | Dave Swersky | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 370 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2010 at 13:47 | history | edited | Dave Swersky | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 19:50 | comment | added | Steffen Opel | @Dave - no worries, just realized it by chance and thought you could make it easier for new users easily ;) | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 16:18 | comment | added | Dave Swersky | @Steffen: Sorry about that, changed the name at your suggestion and forgot to update the links! It should work now: bitbucket.org/dswersky/stacklinq | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 16:17 | history | edited | Dave Swersky | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 18 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 9:06 | comment | added | Steffen Opel | @Dave - your download link has not been updated to bitbucket.org/dswersky/stacklinq yet (and I'm still lacking appropriate edit rights by far ;) | |
| Jun 30, 2010 at 1:42 | history | edited | Dave Swersky | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
changed name
|
| Jun 30, 2010 at 1:18 | answer | added | Steffen Opel | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 29, 2010 at 20:24 | comment | added | Dave Swersky | @code: The modeling project is no more, the sequence diagram has been added to the main project. | |
| Jun 29, 2010 at 19:39 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | i was thinking more of the modeling project and sequence diagrams that are missing from the solution. nothing like hinting at something to get some people wanting it, but i understand scratch projects so no worry if they are not meant to be public. | |
| Jun 29, 2010 at 19:14 | comment | added | Dave Swersky | @code: It's been quite a journey, LINQ Providers are opaque to say the least ;) I considered basing L2SO on your model, and did a quick spike to try it out, but I had gone too far in another direction. I'll create a clone and clean up the references so the codebase works without issue on download. As for modeling, you want a class diagram? | |
| Jun 29, 2010 at 18:47 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | dave, you might want to make a local temp clone to identify the missing files so that you can resolve them in your main repo so that the solution loads without difficulty. Apparently they are vestigal but the proj files are still referencing them. also, the modeling would be interesting to see. | |
| Jun 29, 2010 at 18:03 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | + i have been keeping an eye on this. i like where you are going. you don't know how relieved i was when you spoke up. i was not looking forward to breaking the ground on this. | |
| Jun 29, 2010 at 17:03 | history | asked | Dave Swersky | CC BY-SA 2.5 |