Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

This query fails:

http://stackauth.com/0.8/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

In Python for a jason.loads call, I get an error: 'ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")'.

I get this in the address bar when attempted using a browser:

http://stackauth.com/error?aspxerrorpath=/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

But the useruser has associated accounts. I see this with many users.

Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?

This query fails:

http://stackauth.com/0.8/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

In Python for a jason.loads call, I get an error: 'ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")'.

I get this in the address bar when attempted using a browser:

http://stackauth.com/error?aspxerrorpath=/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

But the user has associated accounts. I see this with many users.

Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?

This query fails:

http://stackauth.com/0.8/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

In Python for a jason.loads call, I get an error: 'ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")'.

I get this in the address bar when attempted using a browser:

http://stackauth.com/error?aspxerrorpath=/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

But the user has associated accounts. I see this with many users.

Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?

edited tags
Link
Kevin Montrose
  • 18.7k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 62
Source Link

Why do some Stackauth associated queries fail?

This query fails:

http://stackauth.com/0.8/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

In Python for a jason.loads call, I get an error: 'ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")'.

I get this in the address bar when attempted using a browser:

http://stackauth.com/error?aspxerrorpath=/users/137b94e5-050c-4dd5-82c1-aeb2af0814f5/associated

But the user has associated accounts. I see this with many users.

Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?