Timeline for Obsolete - StackTack, a JavaScript widget you can stick anywhere
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
103 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jun 30 at 20:32 | history | edited | rene♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added obsolete tag as the links to the code repositories and live demo returns "Page not found"
|
S Jun 30 at 20:32 | history | suggested | Wicket | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added obsolete tag as the links to the code repositories and live demo returns "Page not found"
|
Jun 29 at 21:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 30 at 20:32 | |||||
Sep 10, 2021 at 10:01 | comment | added | OfirD | Here's my own StackTack fork (which itself is just a fork of the aforementioned fork) to make it work with Python 3. | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackapps.com/ with https://stackapps.com/
|
|
Jul 23, 2016 at 16:56 | comment | added | Soviut | Out of the box I don't think so, but it would be easy enough to change the API URL to point to the documentation system. | |
Jul 23, 2016 at 13:42 | comment | added | Michael Zlatkovsky |
Is it possible to use StackTack with the new StackOverflow Documentation (stackoverflow.com/documentation)? What would it take to make it work? The current syntax of <div id="stacktack-1227286"></div> is question-id-based, which doesn't match the syntax of the documentation topics...
|
|
Jun 7, 2016 at 7:37 | comment | added | mtk | @Soviut can Unix.Stackexchange and Islam.SE website Q&A be shown using this? | |
S Mar 15, 2016 at 15:56 | history | edited | Brock Adams | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
the domain is parked
|
S Mar 15, 2016 at 15:56 | history | suggested | geek1011 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
the link is broken
|
Mar 15, 2016 at 12:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 15, 2016 at 15:56 | |||||
S Apr 2, 2015 at 9:00 | history | suggested | DaAwesomeP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Google APIS use HTTPS when needed
|
Apr 2, 2015 at 7:39 | comment | added | Soviut | Also there is this "remix" stackapps.com/questions/3244/… | |
Apr 2, 2015 at 7:38 | comment | added | Soviut | Sorry guys, the domain expired on me when I wasn't keeping an eye on it. There are mirrors of the repo on github github.com/nathan-osman/StackTack | |
Apr 2, 2015 at 1:07 | comment | added | Brock Adams |
app.stacktack.com appears to be defunct and stacktack.com appears to have switched to a "fashion and beauty" site in July of 2014.
|
|
Apr 2, 2015 at 0:31 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 2, 2015 at 9:00 | |||||
Sep 22, 2014 at 19:51 | history | edited | Brock Adams | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Oops, missed one
|
Sep 22, 2014 at 19:31 | comment | added | brasofilo | @Brock, yep, thought of that after submitting the edit, thx for heads up. | |
Sep 22, 2014 at 19:24 | comment | added | Brock Adams |
@brasofilo (and Soviut), thanks for recovering the image, but the correct thing to do is set images using the built-in tool (Ctrl G or matching button), so that the images are kept on Stack Exchange's dedicated and reliable image server.
|
|
Sep 22, 2014 at 19:21 | history | edited | Brock Adams | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Used correct image server
|
S Sep 22, 2014 at 4:22 | history | suggested | brasofilo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Pulled dead links from the Wayback Machine
|
Sep 22, 2014 at 3:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Sep 22, 2014 at 4:22 | |||||
Sep 2, 2014 at 23:54 | comment | added | Jeffrey Bosboom | Using a locally-hosted script from the bitbucket repo (which includes apiVersion: '2.2' in its defaults), I'm still seeing requests getting redirected to the "API 1.x shutdown" page. Did more than just the version number change? | |
May 14, 2014 at 19:55 | comment | added | Soviut | I updated the bitbucket repo but haven't had a chance to push the changes to S3 yet. | |
May 14, 2014 at 11:50 | comment | added | magnattic | The live demo doesn't work for me (current Chrome). I get JS syntax errors and it only shows "loading question XYZ". | |
Feb 6, 2014 at 1:57 | answer | added | Cilan | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 5, 2013 at 13:44 | answer | added | gamehelp16 | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 3, 2012 at 17:23 | answer | added | mtk | timeline score: 4 | |
Aug 27, 2012 at 16:19 | comment | added | San Francesco | That's a really good job @Soviut. I tried it with my blog and it's working fine but I want to know if there is a way to just embed a particular answer instead of the whole questions + answers? Thanks for help. | |
Dec 31, 2011 at 15:50 | answer | added | osiixy | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 12, 2011 at 21:30 | comment | added | Goodbye Stack Exchange | Forgive me if this is a question that's been asked, but is there a way to use this with the StackExchange per-site blogs? | |
Sep 11, 2011 at 16:19 | comment | added | Soviut | @Rebecca, Thanks, I've pulled. Now I just have to get it on S3. | |
Sep 10, 2011 at 7:28 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff | I just submitted a pull request on BitBucket for ya. A couple broken urls. Great project! | |
Jul 15, 2011 at 19:46 | comment | added | Soviut | Excellent. I actually realized after that the undefined error wasn't coming from the parameter on the user object being undefined, but rather the entire user object was undefined. So now it simply skips the profile creation step if no user is passed. | |
Jul 15, 2011 at 10:44 | comment | added | systempuntoout | @Soviu working :) yup. | |
Jul 14, 2011 at 21:48 | comment | added | Soviut | Sorry, I did that quickly and forgot to actually use the email hash in the url. I've fixed that. Expect the CDN to update in about 24 hours. | |
Jul 13, 2011 at 19:37 | comment | added | systempuntoout | @Soviut sorry for bugging you mate, but the problem persists :(. gaecupboard.com/post/… | |
Jul 13, 2011 at 8:47 | comment | added | Soviut | @systempuntoout this should be fixed now. Give it 24 hours to propagate over the S3. | |
Jul 11, 2011 at 20:47 | comment | added | systempuntoout |
@Soviut this Programmers question gives a javascript error on StackTack. You can test it here. Chrome says Cannot read property 'email hash' of undefined .
|
|
Jul 2, 2011 at 12:51 | answer | added | Nazmul | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 28, 2011 at 2:52 | comment | added | Soviut | Sorry about the domain outage. It was fixed as soon as I noticed. | |
Jun 25, 2011 at 18:37 | comment | added | bevacqua | awesome! I'll be using it on my blog when I make one (soon)! Great job. | |
Jun 9, 2011 at 17:30 | history | rollback | Adam Wright |
Rollback to Revision 12 - Reverting my domain warning now they're renewed it
|
|
Jun 3, 2011 at 20:14 | history | edited | Adam Wright | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Domain expired? Editing this to make the screenshot work in the meantime.; deleted 74 characters in body
|
S Mar 22, 2011 at 0:25 | history | suggested | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Copy edit. Using the official names of sites -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, "Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name".
|
Mar 19, 2011 at 13:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 22, 2011 at 0:25 | |||||
Feb 16, 2011 at 11:43 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
updated thumbnail
|
Feb 11, 2011 at 21:09 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 50 characters in body
|
Feb 11, 2011 at 20:40 | history | edited | Kevin Montrose | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
thumbnail was broken
|
Feb 10, 2011 at 23:00 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added thumbnail
|
Dec 1, 2010 at 0:41 | comment | added | Soviut | @Chris, it could be an issue with how often you're polling their service. The changes I suggested should not have caused this. | |
Nov 30, 2010 at 14:59 | comment | added | Chris S | @Soviut I've added your changes, however I'm getting banned by IP when I click two questions in the link above. Is there some way of avoiding this? | |
Nov 26, 2010 at 22:31 | comment | added | Soviut | @Chris, one solution would be to put the stacktack() function call inside the click event that expands the question. Be sure to use selectors in the click to target the specific question div, for example: $(this).find('.question').stacktack(); | |
Nov 26, 2010 at 11:44 | comment | added | Chris S | I'm using stacktack at shrinkrays.net/code-snippets/csharp/… - is there a way to force it to dynamically load questions? At the moment it's hitting api.stackoverflow.com with all the questions | |
Nov 17, 2010 at 20:44 | comment | added | zengr | It's awesome! works like a charm: utkarshsengar.com/2010/11/… | |
Nov 3, 2010 at 18:27 | comment | added | Soviut | I've actually already posted a tutorial as an answer here that explains the steps needed to accomplish this. It explains how to edit the theme HTML as well as how to post a Tack in a text post on Tumblr. | |
Nov 3, 2010 at 13:54 | comment | added | myusuf3 | @Soviut could i get a sample code snippet? as well as how you installed it with tumblr i tried looking at page source no mas :) | |
Nov 2, 2010 at 23:31 | comment | added | Soviut | I forgot to mention, S3 will take about a day to propagate so you may not see it working until tomorrow. My mistake. | |
Nov 2, 2010 at 20:52 | comment | added | myusuf3 | @Soviut it doesn't seem to work. | |
Nov 2, 2010 at 20:06 | answer | added | Soviut | timeline score: 13 | |
Nov 2, 2010 at 19:53 | comment | added | Soviut | @garbagecollector, Tumblr sanitized html IDs from any html I tried to put in a text post, so I updated the plugin to allow class-based IDs as well. See it in action here: zamtools.tumblr.com/post/1463290085/stacktack | |
Nov 1, 2010 at 14:24 | comment | added | myusuf3 | @soviut also could you test it on tumblr as well. I would be amazing to be able to embed SO discussions in posts, on the fly. | |
Nov 1, 2010 at 5:59 | comment | added | Soviut | @garbagecollector, I'm planning a 1.1 release soon which will allow for complete API urls. Currently the plugin makes too many assumptions about how the api path will be named. | |
Oct 29, 2010 at 14:01 | comment | added | myusuf3 | Would it be possible to add support for, other stackexchange sites like askubuntu.com | |
Aug 25, 2010 at 18:16 | answer | added | C. Ross | timeline score: 28 | |
Aug 11, 2010 at 4:17 | answer | added | Soviut | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 17:32 | comment | added | Soviut | The linking issues should be resolved as well as the tag styles. I plan to make a very explicit stylesheet override on any content within the container to ensure all content is unaffected by any more blog themes. | |
Jul 13, 2010 at 19:49 | comment | added | Soviut | @Kevin, bitbucket.org/zamtools/stacktack/issue/2/… I've made a ticket for it and will be addressing this shortly. | |
Jul 13, 2010 at 14:31 | comment | added | Kevin | I think the links are broken. Seems to be an error on the domain redirect for www.stackoverflow.com. | |
Jul 13, 2010 at 10:42 | answer | added | TWith2Sugars | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 12, 2010 at 8:56 | comment | added | Soviut | @TWith2Sugars, post a link as an answer if you've implemented it publicly. I'd love to see it in action. | |
Jul 12, 2010 at 8:50 | comment | added | TWith2Sugars | Very nice, I've given it a go and it's sweeeeet | |
Jul 10, 2010 at 2:45 | comment | added | Soviut | Now targeting Stack API 1.0, the files will propagate on S3 in about 24 hours. Nothing broke and nothing changed, so don't expect any surprises (knock on wood) | |
Jul 8, 2010 at 6:15 | comment | added | Soviut | Now listed on StackList at stacklist.quickmediasolutions.com/view_app.php?id=34 | |
Jul 7, 2010 at 3:27 | comment | added | Nathan Osman | Please consider listing StackTack on StackList. | |
Jun 25, 2010 at 6:19 | answer | added | Soviut | timeline score: 5 | |
Jun 25, 2010 at 6:15 | answer | added | Soviut | timeline score: 19 | |
Jun 25, 2010 at 5:44 | answer | added | Maxim Zaslavsky | timeline score: 8 | |
Jun 25, 2010 at 3:11 | comment | added | Soviut | StackTack now targets Stack API 0.9. I've also added a JQueryUI dialog example to the demo page. It should propagate across S3 in about 24 hours, as usual. | |
Jun 24, 2010 at 17:55 | comment | added | Soviut | @systempuntoout, his backend has nothing to do with the tack in his modal dialog, that's all happening client side. Just import JQueryUI into your page, create a stacktack div and tell a JQueryUI modal dialog to wrap it. jqueryui.com/demos/dialog/#modal | |
Jun 23, 2010 at 7:16 | comment | added | Soviut | @systempuntoout, you may want to look at what Farseeker did with SAggregator stackapps.com/questions/570/… He was able to get a Tack to display inside a JQuery UI modal dialogue. | |
Jun 20, 2010 at 3:16 | comment | added | Soviut | I had to revert the api version to 0.8 for now since the 1.0 hosting seems unstable. The update should propagate in about 24 hours over S3. | |
Jun 19, 2010 at 2:54 | comment | added | Soviut | StackTack now targets version 1.0 of the stack API, in compliance with the rules. All seems well so both the normal and minified versions of the javascript should be propagated across S3 in 24 hours. | |
Jun 19, 2010 at 2:43 | comment | added | Soviut | @Oscar, me too! That would really make it worth the effort. | |
Jun 19, 2010 at 1:21 | comment | added | OscarRyz | Brilliant, I hope to see many of these "tack" around the web in the future. | |
Jun 10, 2010 at 7:02 | comment | added | Soviut | Answers are now explicitly requested in the ajax call as per the changes made in this ticket stackapps.com/questions/613/… The changes should propagate across S3 in roughly 24 hours. | |
Jun 8, 2010 at 16:52 | comment | added | Soviut | It would be unlikly to break the 10K limit as this is all happening from the client's browser in Javascript using Ajax, not a central server. This means each request a visitor is making requests from their own IP. If one user were to refresh the page 10,000 times in a day, then they might hit the limit. | |
Jun 8, 2010 at 11:22 | comment | added | Mark Rushakoff | +1 for a really cool use of the API. Seems like it could easily break the 10k hit limit if it gets even a modest amount of exposure, though (which is probably a good thing!). | |
Jun 8, 2010 at 7:57 | comment | added | Soviut | Thanks to Farseeker for integrating StackTack into his SAggregator app, I've added a link to it in the description. | |
Jun 8, 2010 at 7:56 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added ref
|
Jun 8, 2010 at 5:48 | comment | added | Nippysaurus | This is really cool! | |
Jun 6, 2010 at 3:22 | comment | added | Mark Henderson |
Using jquery.stacktack.min.js returns an XML file with access denied , but using jquery.stacktack.js works OK.
|
|
Jun 5, 2010 at 3:20 | comment | added | Soviut | Please let me know if anybody actually implements this on their site or blog. I'm interested to see it in the wild. Also, the S3 mirrors are still propagating so the jquery.stacktack.min.js may still pull the wrong stylesheets for another day or so. | |
Jun 4, 2010 at 19:12 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Jun 4, 2010 at 18:02 | comment | added | Andy West | Very impressive. | |
Jun 4, 2010 at 16:50 | comment | added | Nathan Osman | Man, this is one awesome idea! | |
Jun 4, 2010 at 16:23 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
Jun 4, 2010 at 8:35 | comment | added | Maxim Zaslavsky | Not only is this a brilliant idea, it also looks so wonderful. Good job! | |
Jun 4, 2010 at 8:25 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Jun 4, 2010 at 7:12 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | ++ slick is the word | |
Jun 4, 2010 at 6:55 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 30 characters in body; added 29 characters in body
|
Jun 4, 2010 at 6:29 | history | edited | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 159 characters in body; added 378 characters in body
|
Jun 4, 2010 at 6:13 | history | asked | Soviut | CC BY-SA 2.5 |