Timeline for Allow registrant to use write access without linking Stack Apps post
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2015 at 20:07 | comment | added | Tim Stone♦ | The only possible downside would be making sure this requirement was made clear, otherwise people might publish an app without creating the post and then no one could use it. | |
| Jun 23, 2015 at 20:06 | comment | added | Tim Stone♦ | The association is already tracked internally, so that's mostly only a concern for users of the application to have a place to complain. Assuming we still require a post for anyone who is not the API key owner to use the key, I think we'd end up with the best of both worlds (i.e. no app posts until the app is ready for others to use) | |
| Jun 23, 2015 at 20:04 | comment | added | Brock Adams | Only justification I can see is possible (future) auditing? IE, I see/install Super_Evil_App and can then trace it by ID (somehow? some day?) to a Stack Apps post and Stack Apps user? | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 21:43 | comment | added | Brock Adams | Related: (1) Original feature request (now edited), and (2) Error message and placeholder workaround, and (3) Ancient sandbox request/workaround (but still needs a placeholder post with API 2.2). | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 18:55 | history | asked | Tim Stone♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |