Timeline for AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackapps.com/ with https://stackapps.com/
|
|
| Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 | comment | added | virtualxtc | @Benjol that would work for me! | |
| Mar 3, 2014 at 10:03 | comment | added | Benjol | see here: github.com/Benjol/SE-AutoReviewComments/issues/6 | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 8:28 | comment | added | virtualxtc | @Benjol, site specific sets should also be kept; but given that most new users run into problems with the general SE format, I'd suspect there's still plenty of room for a pan-site list. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 8:26 | comment | added | virtualxtc | @Benjol if a robot can comment, then the comment should appear before the user can submit their post; However if everyone were to use and revise the "preferred language" I would think that would only add clarity as to what action needs to be taken and why. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 6:19 | comment | added | Benjol | On reflexion, I think this should be done per site on their own meta. @Izzy did this very recently on SR | |
| Jan 9, 2014 at 6:24 | comment | added | Benjol | Or meta Stack Overflow? Depends on whether you think there are standard cross-site messages. Some users seem to prefer to tailor their comments for specific sites. And, that aside, I think it is probably preferable for each person to craft their own, because that avoids the appearance of 'robo-commenting' - which seems to be the main fear that prevents this script being integrated into SE. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 17:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 7, 2014 at 16:54 | |||||
| S Jan 8, 2014 at 16:54 | history | answered | virtualxtc | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Jan 8, 2014 at 16:54 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by virtualxtc |