Timeline for Should there be a discovery API?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2010 at 18:49 | comment | added | Kevin Montrose | @Greg - fixed it. | |
| Jul 16, 2010 at 18:49 | history | edited | Kevin Montrose | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
| Jul 16, 2010 at 18:44 | comment | added | Greg Bray | I can't edit posts yet, so here is the correct link for StackAuth 1.0 API: stackauth.com/1.0/help | |
| Jul 6, 2010 at 22:07 | history | edited | Kevin Montrose | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 112 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2010 at 21:16 | comment | added | Steffen Opel |
+1 - this scenario has been implemented via the StackAuth routes in the meantime as (implicitly) documented here for example, so thanks for that! Shouldn't the status be changed from deferred to completed then? For the record, I'd personally preferred it to be http://api.stackexchange.com for consistency with other special sites within the Stack Exchange network (like area51, odata, etc.) rather than an entirely new out of band site, but alas, that's mostly a subjective matter ...
|
|
| May 29, 2010 at 19:11 | vote | accept | TheHurt | ||
| May 28, 2010 at 20:11 | history | answered | Kevin Montrose | CC BY-SA 2.5 |