Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Kevin Montrose
  • 18.7k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 62

I agree that there needs to be a way to discover API endpoints. Especially with the brave new world of SE 2.0 potentially leading to an ever increasing number of API-ified sites out there.

However, there isn't a good place to shove this functionality just yet.

Currently, we only have two places it could go:

  • api.[stackoverflow|superuser|serverfault|meta.stackoverflow].com
    • not "global," and accordingly shouldn't know about all the other sites in the network
  • api.stackapps.com
    • more "global," than the above, but also a site onto itself; it'd be a weird one-off to also have it serve up a network map

A similar problem exists with getting user associated accounts.

In short, once there is a place for this data to come from it'll be made available. Most likely, this will exist "out of band" from the regular API.


See StackAuthStackAuth - /sites route - for endpoint discovery.

I agree that there needs to be a way to discover API endpoints. Especially with the brave new world of SE 2.0 potentially leading to an ever increasing number of API-ified sites out there.

However, there isn't a good place to shove this functionality just yet.

Currently, we only have two places it could go:

  • api.[stackoverflow|superuser|serverfault|meta.stackoverflow].com
    • not "global," and accordingly shouldn't know about all the other sites in the network
  • api.stackapps.com
    • more "global," than the above, but also a site onto itself; it'd be a weird one-off to also have it serve up a network map

A similar problem exists with getting user associated accounts.

In short, once there is a place for this data to come from it'll be made available. Most likely, this will exist "out of band" from the regular API.


See StackAuth - /sites route - for endpoint discovery.

I agree that there needs to be a way to discover API endpoints. Especially with the brave new world of SE 2.0 potentially leading to an ever increasing number of API-ified sites out there.

However, there isn't a good place to shove this functionality just yet.

Currently, we only have two places it could go:

  • api.[stackoverflow|superuser|serverfault|meta.stackoverflow].com
    • not "global," and accordingly shouldn't know about all the other sites in the network
  • api.stackapps.com
    • more "global," than the above, but also a site onto itself; it'd be a weird one-off to also have it serve up a network map

A similar problem exists with getting user associated accounts.

In short, once there is a place for this data to come from it'll be made available. Most likely, this will exist "out of band" from the regular API.


See StackAuth - /sites route - for endpoint discovery.

added 112 characters in body
Source Link
Kevin Montrose
  • 18.7k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 62

I agree that there needs to be a way to discover API endpoints. Especially with the brave new world of SE 2.0 potentially leading to an ever increasing number of API-ified sites out there.

However, there isn't a good place to shove this functionality just yet.

Currently, we only have two places it could go:

  • api.[stackoverflow|superuser|serverfault|meta.stackoverflow].com
    • not "global," and accordingly shouldn't know about all the other sites in the network
  • api.stackapps.com
    • more "global," than the above, but also a site onto itself; it'd be a weird one-off to also have it serve up a network map

A similar problem exists with getting user associated accounts.

In short, once there is a place for this data to come from it'll be made available. Most likely, this will exist "out of band" from the regular API.


See StackAuth - /sites route - for endpoint discovery.

I agree that there needs to be a way to discover API endpoints. Especially with the brave new world of SE 2.0 potentially leading to an ever increasing number of API-ified sites out there.

However, there isn't a good place to shove this functionality just yet.

Currently, we only have two places it could go:

  • api.[stackoverflow|superuser|serverfault|meta.stackoverflow].com
    • not "global," and accordingly shouldn't know about all the other sites in the network
  • api.stackapps.com
    • more "global," than the above, but also a site onto itself; it'd be a weird one-off to also have it serve up a network map

A similar problem exists with getting user associated accounts.

In short, once there is a place for this data to come from it'll be made available. Most likely, this will exist "out of band" from the regular API.

I agree that there needs to be a way to discover API endpoints. Especially with the brave new world of SE 2.0 potentially leading to an ever increasing number of API-ified sites out there.

However, there isn't a good place to shove this functionality just yet.

Currently, we only have two places it could go:

  • api.[stackoverflow|superuser|serverfault|meta.stackoverflow].com
    • not "global," and accordingly shouldn't know about all the other sites in the network
  • api.stackapps.com
    • more "global," than the above, but also a site onto itself; it'd be a weird one-off to also have it serve up a network map

A similar problem exists with getting user associated accounts.

In short, once there is a place for this data to come from it'll be made available. Most likely, this will exist "out of band" from the regular API.


See StackAuth - /sites route - for endpoint discovery.

Source Link
Kevin Montrose
  • 18.7k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 62

I agree that there needs to be a way to discover API endpoints. Especially with the brave new world of SE 2.0 potentially leading to an ever increasing number of API-ified sites out there.

However, there isn't a good place to shove this functionality just yet.

Currently, we only have two places it could go:

  • api.[stackoverflow|superuser|serverfault|meta.stackoverflow].com
    • not "global," and accordingly shouldn't know about all the other sites in the network
  • api.stackapps.com
    • more "global," than the above, but also a site onto itself; it'd be a weird one-off to also have it serve up a network map

A similar problem exists with getting user associated accounts.

In short, once there is a place for this data to come from it'll be made available. Most likely, this will exist "out of band" from the regular API.