Timeline for Draft Specification for API v2.0
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 18, 2020 at 8:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Dec 21, 2011 at 19:52 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Dec 21, 2011 at 19:52 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
Dec 13, 2011 at 18:42 | history | notice added | Jeremy | Draw attention | |
Dec 13, 2011 at 18:42 | history | bounty started | Jeremy | ||
Dec 4, 2011 at 5:45 | answer | added | Jeremy | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 1, 2011 at 6:27 | answer | added | Chris Frederick | timeline score: 7 | |
Sep 28, 2011 at 18:25 | comment | added | Tim Stone♦ | Makes sense. I sometimes wish the other routes could return Markdown too, but I guess that's more than likely a narrow userscript-related usecase. | |
Sep 28, 2011 at 18:21 | comment | added | Kevin Montrose | @Tim - no, that's one of those bugs we got stuck with since people rely on it. | |
Sep 27, 2011 at 14:48 | comment | added | Tim Stone♦ |
Partly related to all of the fields being HTML-safe, will /users/{id}/timeline continue to return Markdown instead of HTML?
|
|
Sep 21, 2011 at 22:13 | answer | added | svick | timeline score: 8 | |
Sep 20, 2011 at 11:30 | answer | added | Adam Wright | timeline score: 9 | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 23:41 | comment | added | Adam Davis | Looking forward to beta! | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 22:42 | comment | added | Kevin Montrose |
@badp - I was considering /you/* or /authed/* before I (re-)discovered Facebook's use of /me. Figured it was better to use something dev's would be more likely to guess from familiarity with another API than be different for the sake of being different.
|
|
Sep 17, 2011 at 22:21 | comment | added | Jonathan. | @kevin, oh and I never said thanks for all the hard work you and the SE team put into this, so thanks :) | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 22:20 | answer | added | Jonathan. | timeline score: 1 | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 22:12 | answer | added | badp | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 22:11 | comment | added | Jonathan. | @kevin, 1.1 is ok, but the pagination of sites is quite annoying, as typically you get all sites at once, rather than questions etc where you only want a few at a time. | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 21:57 | comment | added | badp |
/my/comments would "feel" so much better than /me/comments .
|
|
Sep 17, 2011 at 21:57 | comment | added | Kevin Montrose | @Jonathan - there are 1.1 equivalents, so yes. 1.x isn't getting shut down when 2.0 launches anyway, so all 3 versions will be available (at least for a while). | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 21:55 | comment | added | Jonathan. | Will any 1.0 methods be carried over, specifically the stackauth routes (starting to read the spec now so I apologise if it has been answered in it) | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 20:33 | history | asked | Kevin Montrose | CC BY-SA 3.0 |