Timeline for Can the server side of the API be open sourced?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2010 at 0:20 | vote | accept | ripper234 | ||
| May 21, 2010 at 9:20 | comment | added | Tim Post | Rip off, borrow or clone - the fact remains that anyone interested in presenting a compatible API could do so without a lot of effort. We've already defined the methods, rooted out methods that did not work well (or were lacking) and put it to the test. Monkey see? Monkey can copy. | |
| May 21, 2010 at 6:39 | comment | added | Franci Penov | 'ripping off' is the right word. | |
| May 21, 2010 at 6:36 | comment | added | lexu | 'ripping' of is so negativ... (cloning an idea is a compliment to the original good idea) The value of all the stack-apps is not so much the code, it's the community. | |
| May 21, 2010 at 6:33 | comment | added | John Sheehan | The others had no trouble ripping off the UX, it shouldn't be too difficult for them to follow suit on the API. | |
| May 21, 2010 at 6:33 | comment | added | lexu | Good point .. but now add an official 'test suite' to validate/endorse a 3rd party implementation .. | |
| May 21, 2010 at 6:30 | history | answered | John Sheehan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |