Timeline for Can we have an Owner Name value in Question, Answer, and Comment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Jul 11, 2010 at 15:49 | comment | added | jjnguy | @Kevin In reading your last comment, I think you mis-understand my request. Instead of returning a User-Object with no id, just return the User Name in the comment, answer, and question object. (No user-object required) | |
Jul 11, 2010 at 15:47 | comment | added | jjnguy | @Kevin, but do you agree that this is a small oversight? (By everyone, this has not been noticed before I don't think) | |
Jul 11, 2010 at 8:30 | history | edited | Kevin Montrose |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 11, 2010 at 8:29 | comment | added | Kevin Montrose |
basically 0%. There's no clean place to shove this, as user_id is spec'd as a required value on the returned "user object" and the root problem here is that the user was deleted and thus has no id.
|
|
Jul 11, 2010 at 6:04 | comment | added | jjnguy | Kevin, I know you wanted to keep 1.0 as static as possible, but what are the chances of this change going in during the 1.0 phase? | |
Jul 11, 2010 at 6:02 | history | edited | jjnguy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
i cnt tpye...
|
Jul 11, 2010 at 5:51 | comment | added | Maxim Zaslavsky | Hmm, you're right, that's kinda weird. | |
Jul 11, 2010 at 0:20 | history | edited | jjnguy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added another sentence because i'm bored
|
Jul 10, 2010 at 17:35 | history | edited | jjnguy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added link to a request
|
Jul 10, 2010 at 17:27 | history | asked | jjnguy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |