Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link
replaced http://stackapps.com/ with https://stackapps.com/
Source Link

I've 'averaged' the few answers and comments and included the respective result below each question (all results are executed accordingly for some time already in most dev-tipdev-tip posts). The empirical base here is obviously quite low, but so is the activity on Stack Apps in general still, hence this should do for now and can be updated/adjusted as needed.

I really like the approach code poetcode poet has taken with his dev-tipdev-tip series and would like to see this evolve into a developer recipe like cookbook kinda thing/HOWTO/FAQ. However, if I look at the list of questions tagged dev-tipdev-tip several questions pop up immediately. So I'd like to open a short discussion on the following early on, assuming this is a good time to refine the format without triggering to many change requirements; please consider each question as a separate topic in principle:

  1. Should we drop the 'dev-tip' tag? [added from code poets answercode poets answer]
    => NO
  • I agree with code poets reasoning here to keep it because this communicates the initial intent of the post being guidance, see his answerhis answer for details.

I've 'averaged' the few answers and comments and included the respective result below each question (all results are executed accordingly for some time already in most dev-tip posts). The empirical base here is obviously quite low, but so is the activity on Stack Apps in general still, hence this should do for now and can be updated/adjusted as needed.

I really like the approach code poet has taken with his dev-tip series and would like to see this evolve into a developer recipe like cookbook kinda thing/HOWTO/FAQ. However, if I look at the list of questions tagged dev-tip several questions pop up immediately. So I'd like to open a short discussion on the following early on, assuming this is a good time to refine the format without triggering to many change requirements; please consider each question as a separate topic in principle:

  1. Should we drop the 'dev-tip' tag? [added from code poets answer]
    => NO
  • I agree with code poets reasoning here to keep it because this communicates the initial intent of the post being guidance, see his answer for details.

I've 'averaged' the few answers and comments and included the respective result below each question (all results are executed accordingly for some time already in most dev-tip posts). The empirical base here is obviously quite low, but so is the activity on Stack Apps in general still, hence this should do for now and can be updated/adjusted as needed.

I really like the approach code poet has taken with his dev-tip series and would like to see this evolve into a developer recipe like cookbook kinda thing/HOWTO/FAQ. However, if I look at the list of questions tagged dev-tip several questions pop up immediately. So I'd like to open a short discussion on the following early on, assuming this is a good time to refine the format without triggering to many change requirements; please consider each question as a separate topic in principle:

  1. Should we drop the 'dev-tip' tag? [added from code poets answer]
    => NO
  • I agree with code poets reasoning here to keep it because this communicates the initial intent of the post being guidance, see his answer for details.
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Source Link
  • I'm aware and in favor of the community wiki concept in general and think this would make sense for the question immediately indeed. However, this would turn all answers into cwiki automatically too, which wouldn't properly honor/motivate the effort put into posting a code snippet for another programming language for example. So this is a bit difficult - I'm not into the respective meta discussions, couldn't this get sorted over time, i.e. use cwiki automatically/voluntarily for the moment and see how it evolves?
  • I'm aware and in favor of the community wiki concept in general and think this would make sense for the question immediately indeed. However, this would turn all answers into cwiki automatically too, which wouldn't properly honor/motivate the effort put into posting a code snippet for another programming language for example. So this is a bit difficult - I'm not into the respective meta discussions, couldn't this get sorted over time, i.e. use cwiki automatically/voluntarily for the moment and see how it evolves?
Summarized current results.
Source Link
Steffen Opel
  • 1.4k
  • 8
  • 14
Loading
Added question 5 adopted from Kevin Montroses comment.
Source Link
Steffen Opel
  • 1.4k
  • 8
  • 14
Loading
Added question 4 adopted from code poets answer.
Source Link
Steffen Opel
  • 1.4k
  • 8
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
Steffen Opel
  • 1.4k
  • 8
  • 14
Loading