Timeline for How to format reputation numbers similar to Stack Exchange sites
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 3, 2014 at 14:23 | history | edited | RegDwight | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
Aug 14, 2010 at 23:03 | comment | added | jjnguy | @Code, Yeah. I didn't test out any of them, but it looks liek a bunch of them truncate instead of rounding. | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 22:37 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | @jjn - so what you are saying is that the examples shown truncate instead of round up as SO does? I can't speak for any but stackapps.com/questions/1012/… which performs as desired. | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 22:14 | comment | added | jjnguy | It looks like most of the implementations here are slightly off. Numbers like 10999 would show as 11k. Also 12452 would be 12.5k. SO rounds up. | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 21:56 | answer | added | Brock Woolf | timeline score: 5 | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 17:15 | answer | added | Lucas Jones | timeline score: 3 | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 12:54 | answer | added | Sky Sanders | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 10, 2010 at 19:19 | history | edited | Sky Sanders | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
Jul 10, 2010 at 18:43 | answer | added | lfoust | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 7, 2010 at 5:59 | answer | added | Nathan Osman | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 6, 2010 at 16:02 | answer | added | Bill the Lizard | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 6, 2010 at 15:58 | history | edited | Bill the Lizard | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
Jul 5, 2010 at 17:05 | history | edited | Sky Sanders | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 165 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2010 at 16:59 | vote | accept | Sky Sanders | ||
Jul 5, 2010 at 17:01 | |||||
Jul 5, 2010 at 16:54 | answer | added | Christian C. Salvadó | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 5, 2010 at 15:54 | history | edited | Sky Sanders | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 58 characters in body; edited tags
|
Jul 5, 2010 at 15:50 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | @jonb - no, i mean that someone showed me a more elegant way to do this and i encouraged him to post it here and hope he does, otherwise I am going to have to post it myself. and, yes, raw data is appropriate for an api return, but i as well as others, in various languages, wish to present this information in a more friendly format. that is what this post is about. | |
Jul 5, 2010 at 15:28 | answer | added | Chase Florell | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 5, 2010 at 10:20 | comment | added | JonB | You mean one that we don't have to manually do? Surely thats the whole point of giving us the "raw" score? We can format it how we like. | |
Jul 5, 2010 at 9:24 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | a more elegant implementation is heading our way... i hope. | |
Jul 5, 2010 at 9:20 | history | rollback | Sky Sanders |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
Jul 5, 2010 at 9:20 | history | rollback | Sky Sanders |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
Jul 5, 2010 at 8:32 | history | edited | Sky Sanders | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
spliced in a better implementation that i got offa the intertubes
|
Jul 5, 2010 at 7:38 | history | edited | Sky Sanders | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 6 characters in body; edited body
|
S Jul 5, 2010 at 7:21 | history | asked | Sky Sanders | CC BY-SA 2.5 | |
S Jul 5, 2010 at 7:21 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by CommunityBot |