Search Results

It's a bit of a Catch-22. Work around it by: Make a app (or script) post for your app (or script). Also tag it with placeholder. And put "PLACEHOLDER - " at the beginning of the title. Provide a sum …

To that end, there is a request to add this information to the Stack Exchange Data Explorer which you should probably support, given your question here. …

I spotted this "answer" as a first-time post: Feature Request Please add support for proxies.... It would be helpful to people behind proxies. …

So, you are making up to 150 requests in a 30 second period (10 "parallel requests", with a 2 second pause in between). And failing at 80 to 100+ seconds of operation and 400 to 500 total requests? …

You can filter (not sort) questions (and to some extent answers) by using the /search/advanced route of the API. The q parameter allows most of the Advanced Search Options. For example, this will fe …

This is a documentation bug in my opinion. The "via Example App" was never included, nor should it be. A user is fully responsible for his or her content, it doesn't, and shouldn't, matter how that …

Note that a URI is not a domain, but this seems to be a common mistake when setting up OAuth2. Also reference: `redirect_uri` is not under the registered domain for this application What exactly …

It's probably because the referenced post has been deleted. The API excludes (most) deleted data (usually).

I think creation_date is a default/universal sorting, unless activity_date is available. (But you know what they say happens when you "ASSUME".)‡ Evidence for: Seems like it would be requir …

Refer to the API Authentication docs; there are a great many things wrong with the URL in the question (at least 5). For starters, it's to the wrong path. stackoverflow.com/oauth/authorize gives helpf …

No, there is no easy way to do this via the API. Related feature requests: Provide a method to search for sites winch merely wanted a search for site name/description. It was declined. Search acro …

I don't know about that Ruby/Gem, but your app registration is not correct. You need to configure your app for explicit OAuth2, per this other answer, except enter localhost instead of example.com. …

I don't think that's a bug, for implicit OAuth. Anyway, if I understand RFC 6749 correctly, that is not how you are supposed to do such extra checks. Use the state parameter. And this works. For exa …

No there is no "Query API", especially not for SQL-like syntax. It sure would be sweet to have an always current version of SEDE† (even if limited to, say, a hundred rows), but this is very unlikely …

Yes, you can find out if the user has received the association bonus using the API. It's a bit clunky though. However, as we discovered, "association bonus rights" are rather meaningless at the mome …