Timeline for -430 rep - why?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 29, 2010 at 14:05 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | @steffen - sorry, this got buried. nope. don't have anything like that. it is obvious the votebot ate a bunch of votes, i watched it do it, 16 of them, but that does not add up to -430. I was the only person that day to have lost rep that day (i do have everyones rep every (almost) day archived see stackapps.com/questions/543) so I suspect manual action against my account. but that is neither here nor there. I am dissatisfied with the handling of many things, this included, but it is clear that the wagons are circled and I am not on the inside. oh well. time to move on. | |
Aug 25, 2010 at 0:23 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
Aug 25, 2010 at 0:23 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 3 | |
Aug 24, 2010 at 12:48 | comment | added | Steffen Opel | Have you by chance some former reputation audits of yours persisted (e.g. I remotely recall you posting one occasionally while demonstrating some API stuff)? Diffing these against a current one might allow to encircle the responsible posts eventually. | |
Aug 24, 2010 at 12:30 | answer | added | Steffen Opel | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 23, 2010 at 11:37 | comment | added | Steffen Opel | @kiamlaluno - I agree in principle, but reasoned just like @code poet for some topics as well more often than not as of today, see my similar exchange with George Edison in the comments to Why could it possibly be considered ‘reputation farming’ asking for solutions to real world API use cases?. It's unfortunate that we don't have a Stack Apps specific Meta site yet, as almost all other Stack Exchange sites do have by now, and this need becomes more obvious almost daily at the moment ... | |
Aug 23, 2010 at 7:53 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | @kia - maybe. but i suspect that the cause and effect are related to ongoing localized 'discussions' and as such would have no relevance on meta. | |
Aug 22, 2010 at 12:58 | answer | added | Matt S. | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 22, 2010 at 3:05 | comment | added | Sky Sanders | @coo - the only deletions I have experience, to my knowledge, have been at my own hand. And sure, there was an upvote here and there but nothing that would account for this, even with a recalc. | |
Aug 22, 2010 at 2:54 | comment | added | coobird | @codepoet Has some of your questions and/or answers been deleted in the past? Rep earned from deleted posts are not deducted until there is a rep recalc, to the best of my knowledge. It seems likely that a rep recalc occurred on your account recently. | |
Aug 22, 2010 at 2:26 | history | asked | Sky Sanders | CC BY-SA 2.5 |