| bio | website | stackexchange.com/users/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | United Kingdom | |
| age | 18 | |
| visits | member for | 3 years |
| seen | May 3 at 20:00 | |
| stats | profile views | 121 |
I'm a 16 year old from the UK whose learning my way around the programming world. Interested in physics, electronics and IT as well. My aim in life to get somewhere in programming or become an astrophysicist, and live into 2100.
Currently making an iPad app for stackexchange sites, which intenses to be part of the learning process only as I dont have an iPad. But now is getting closer to becoming a complete app, pushing me to save up for an iPad.
|
Sep 22 |
awarded | Enthusiast |
|
Sep 22 |
comment |
more styling info on stackauth If I wanted to copy the look and feel of the site I'd need a lot more than the colour of a selected button |
|
Sep 22 |
comment |
more styling info on stackauth It's just that a favicon would really not fit in that well, I guess I could just get the colour manually as it's only a 50x25px ish rectangle that I want to colour in, If my app looks to official you could just remove the API key, blocking the app till I change it, if I was a difficult person. |
|
Sep 21 |
asked | more styling info on stackauth |
|
Sep 20 |
comment |
Rather than remove site from /sites set status close, at least temporarily But stackusers.com isn't continually checking the API is it? |
|
Sep 19 |
comment |
Rather than remove site from /sites set status close, at least temporarily Right i didn't really understand what you just said, but effectively it's easier for sites to miss out a site than it is to get a state variable wrong? As it's easier to miss something out than to return the wrong value. I have not much idea of trnasient and salient mean or about the example you gave hut that's more for kevin I guess. |
|
Sep 19 |
comment |
Rather than remove site from /sites set status close, at least temporarily Errm, I'd thought it was more important to let the user know that a site has been closed. The user thinks WhTF is gadgets? At least if there was site status=closed for a few weeks (or w/e) an app could have banner (etc) saying that gadgets has been closed. |
|
Sep 19 |
accepted | Delay from editing question to seeing the edit in API |
|
Sep 19 |
comment |
Delay from editing question to seeing the edit in API Thought it would be something like this, just found it a bit strange that the API was ahead of the sites and then behind the sites. |
|
Sep 18 |
asked | Delay from editing question to seeing the edit in API |
|
Sep 18 |
comment |
How can I see the next page of favorites using the SO API? if you read the link I gave first you'd see it is 1 to 100 inclusive |
|
Sep 18 |
revised |
How can I see the next page of favorites using the SO API? added 5 characters in body; added 10 characters in body |
|
Sep 18 |
answered | How can I see the next page of favorites using the SO API? |
|
Sep 11 |
answered | Posting questions and answers via API |
|
Sep 10 |
comment |
iStack for iPad sorry, I won't do it again :) |
|
Sep 9 |
asked | iStack for iPad |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
Central Login place You mean people don't have to login, but surely that means they can only log in from the computer where they created the account? And isn't that ver fragile? With objective-c on iOS it is easy to run javascript on a UIwebView, I've just done and "created" a login page which is the right size. Sure I guess there will be some people with different open ids on different sites, but the majority will use one surely as that's why openID exists |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
StackAuth feature requests Or rather, like there's /users on normal api sites which list all the users and then theres /users/{id}, on the stackauth there could be sites/{state} |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
StackAuth feature requests But if you want to remove all the beta sites, then it would be much easier to remove all the sites whose states contain "beta", rather than checking upon each meta whether it's parent site (which as you said could be easier) is in beta and then removing it. Couldn't each normal site have a meta_site (or sub_site) property which is an array, and the array contains what the meta sites currntly do. So in the list of sites you don't get the meta sites at all. The meta sites aren't just linked to the parent, but actaully inside the parent. |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
Central Login place Sorry when i said password above I meant OpenID, Surely a webpage can created with a the simple login buttons (etc) of stacksite (which can then be styled/moved by javascript etc), and it just returns what the stackAuth/users/{id}/association does. |