network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 40 | |
| visits | member for | 3 years |
| seen | Apr 30 at 5:17 | |
| stats | profile views | 11 |
Saved from the web by a job in industry. Coding GUI for computer-aided railway realignment machinery.
At last a job where I have time to do stuff properly and don't have to worry about loads of unfixed bugs coming back to haunt me.
|
Jul 3 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE I've got a correction for this, I'm just waiting a bit to see if there aren't some other fixes that I can fit into the next version too. |
|
Jul 3 |
revised |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE added 26 characters in body |
|
Jul 3 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE Hm, it's an idea. I'm not sure about the execution though. The problem is that the user name is retrieved asynchronously, so dynamically updating the descriptions as you see them in the popup would be... not hard, but work. Alternatively, I could do the replace on insertion, but that might confuse some people. Conclusion: I'm thinking about it. Right now. |
|
Jul 2 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE @ObsessiveFOSS, what would be really nice is to have all the feature requests and bug reports on meta, but I'm not sure that would go down too well.. As for auto-answers, I'm guessing that would get shot down in flames. |
|
May 31 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
May 25 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
May 23 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE @jrg, actually, don't. There seem to be problems with parallel ajax queries here. While trying the next version I found the comments sometimes just disappear and never come back. |
|
May 20 |
awarded | Announcer |
|
May 19 |
awarded | Great Question |
|
May 16 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE Hm, that's not a bad idea. I'll see what I can do. There are quite a lot of requests about the Welcome message. Ideally I should be able to keep everyone happy. We shall see... |
|
May 16 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE A bit of an edge case, I'll bear it in mind. |
|
May 16 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE @jrg, I'll bear it in mind. For the moment, you could try this (I haven't tested): at line 581 add this code: LoadFromRemote(GetStorage("RemoteUrl"), function () { WriteComments(popup); }); |
|
Apr 28 |
revised |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE add planned tag |
|
Apr 25 |
revised |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE Update some text |
|
Apr 25 |
suggested | suggested edit on AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE |
|
Apr 16 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE Yes, it's planned for vNext, just not sure quite how to present it yet. |
|
Apr 11 |
awarded | Necromancer |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE Note that you can now save your comments to a file, read here. |
|
Apr 11 |
revised |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE New screenshot and explanation for remote |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
AutoReviewComments - Pro-forma comments for SE @KitMenke, for testing I used DropBox, the poor man's web server. |
