network profile
| bio | website | gaecupboard.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Italy | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 3 years, 1 month |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 208 |
I'm a software developer, living and working in Italy.
When I'm not developing, I'm running.
My Google App Engine projects:
- GAE Cupboard
- StackPrinter
Contacts:
- @systempuntoout
- Blog
|
Oct 30 |
comment |
last_activity_date meaning on /questions route @Kevin uhm, as suspected it does not consider the comments. Do you know where to look at this information? I would like to be sure that people using StackPrinter print also the new comments. |
|
Oct 27 |
comment |
Separate Request Quotas for Authorized [app]s +1 One thing related to this faq: using Token authentication does not prevent your [app] to be throttled by the request throttling policy; ie, your authenticated [app] could be throttled while fetching an url if other app[s] on your same IP have already consumed the 30 requests per 5 seconds plafond. |
|
Oct 25 |
comment |
StackAuth returning 404? I checked out my code and I noticed that I'm using stackauth.com/sites without 1.0 (Not affected by the DNS change).. What's the difference? |
|
Oct 23 |
comment |
MetaOverflow: Stack Exchange related ATOM feeds +1 good job |
|
Oct 22 |
comment |
pyso.py - Python Stack Overflow library +1 Good job ;).. |
|
Oct 22 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! Marked as accepted because you already knew it would be a problem |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! +1 ahahahahah escaped from a sinking boat. Thank you for the tip. |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! GONE!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! x-ratelimit-current - 29 |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! x-ratelimit-current - 439 |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! x-ratelimit-current - 983 wow, here we are.. |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! totally forgot that brilliant precog question (that I had upvoted months ago). From what I see, just increasing the key limit does not solve the problem. In that scenario, a key hog app could continue to eat from other dishes without any problem leaving the other poor apps starving to death. |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! x-ratelimit-current - 1340 |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! x-ratelimit-current - 1624 |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! x-ratelimit-current - 1947 |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! @Shay Just checked: x-ratelimit-current - 2814 --> I think in few hours will be doomed again |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Google App Engine [app]s - We are all on the same quota! @Vladislav I totally agree that a cloud platform can't be whitelisted! But Twitter offers a way to bypass this problem using authenticated requests per app and/or user. |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
StackPrinter - This IP has exceeded the request-per-day limit. @Vladislav I asked a proper question about this topic at stackapps.com/questions/1713 |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
Application marketing ideas @George Ah, I thought you would write an answer to share your opinion. You know all the things about advertising contest (you have an apps for the purpose) and you could say if it would be good for our apps or not. |
|
Oct 19 |
comment |
StackPrinter - This IP has exceeded the request-per-day limit. @Kevin again I don't get it (00.10 a.m.). It could be trivial but that generated keys would be not registered. Don't you check if a key is registered on API calls? |
