Stack Apps is a question and answer site for apps, scripts, and development with the Stack Exchange API. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Most of the fields returned in the info object are totals, so they're perfect. Some of them are rates though.

  • answers_per_minute
  • badges_per_minute
  • questions_per_minute

Having these fields set at a per minute resolution makes sense for Stack Overflow, but for many (most?) of the sites in the network, these values have no precision. I noticed this when looking at the results for The Workplace:

  "items": [
      "total_questions": 2319,
      "total_unanswered": 3,
      "total_accepted": 1420,
      "total_answers": 8541,
      "questions_per_minute": 0,
      "answers_per_minute": 0.01,
      "total_comments": 28925,
      "total_votes": 91670,
      "total_badges": 17680,
      "badges_per_minute": 0.02,
      "total_users": 8526,
      "new_active_users": 4,
      "api_revision": "2013.10.9.8200"
  "quota_remaining": 9981,
  "quota_max": 10000,
  "has_more": false

Note that questions_per_minute is 0, making it impossible to scale up. answers_per_minute isn't much better at 0.01. Would it make sense to add precision to the values returned in these fields? Is more precision available?

share|improve this question

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .